diff --git a/docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md b/docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md
index 0d4fbd4..badc7f1 100644
--- a/docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md
+++ b/docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md
@@ -147,14 +147,14 @@ Looking at this with regard to current fees illustrates the problem pretty clear
 |    | 100,000 sat | ~ 12,500 sat | 12.5%  |
 |    | 200,000 sat | ~ 12,500 sat | 6.25%  |
 |    | 500,000 sat | ~ 12,500 sat | 2.5%  |
-| L-BTC| 10,000 sat  | 158 sat | 1.5% | 
+| L-BTC| 10,000 sat  | ~ 158 sat | 1.5% | 
 |    | 20,000 sat  | ~ 168 sat | 0.8%  |
 |    | 50,000 sat  | ~ 198 sat | 0.4%  |
 |    | 100,000 sat  | ~ 248 sat | 0.2%  |
 |    | 200,000 sat  | ~ 348 sat | 0.1%  |
 |    | 500,000 sat  | ~ 648 sat | 0.1%  |
 
-You can see that it is *much cheaper* to use L-BTC. In fact its so cheap that its fine to open 25,000 sat channels...thus keeping our hot-wallet exposure risk quite low. 
+You can see that it is *much cheaper* to use L-BTC. In fact its so cheap that its fine to open 25,000 sat channels...thus keeping our hot-wallet exposure risk quite low. (The above was calculated using boltz.exchange )
 
 
 ### Comparing eCash / Lightning / Liquid / BTC