diff --git a/docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md b/docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md
index e4c4d61..57981ac 100644
--- a/docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md
+++ b/docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md
@@ -227,8 +227,8 @@ In theory, you should now have your own federation on your very own sidechain.
 
 ## Final Questions and Thoughts
 
-* Liquid has value in being a testing ground for changes to be real-world tested before they make it into BTC. For example many of the advanced OPCODEs that are argued for inclusion into BTC *already exist* in Liquid[^11]. This transforms Liquid into being something of a "Beta-test" chain for BTC. 
-* Given the above, proponents of Covenants could build some of their use-cases on Liquid. The big debate happening around Covenant OPCODE inclusion has stalled in a chicken-v-egg style standoff. One side is saying: *Show us use-cases of this solving the problems you claim it can* and the other responding *we first need the OPCODEs to build these things*. A potential solution is for Covenant proponents to go build their use-cases on Liquid. Obviously Blockstream thinks these OPCODEs are safe.
+* Liquid is a good testing ground for new OPCODEs being considered for inclusion into BTC. This allows them to be real-world tested before they make it into BTC. For example many of the advanced OPCODEs that are argued for inclusion into BTC for Covenants / Vaults *already exist* in Liquid[^11]. This transforms Liquid into being something of a "Beta-test" chain for BTC. 
+* Given the above, proponents of Covenants could use this to help make their case for inclusion into mainchain BTC. The current debate has stalled in a chicken-egg style standoff. One side is saying: *Show us real world use-cases of this solving problems* and the other responding *we first need the OPCODEs to build these things*. A potential solution is for Covenant proponents to go build their use-cases on Liquid. 
 * Could Fedimints / eCash mints find ways to utilize custom sidechains based on Elements as a way to prove to users that they are not debasing eCash tokens via Frac Reserve? (record eCash issuance as asset issuances on federated sidechain?)
 * Could the community spin up our own Federated version of Liquid? 
 * On **Federation Trusting**. The most hotly debated topic around Liquid is can we trust the Federation to not censure us? I think these are reasonable concerns (but largely overblown).