Update docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
107bb6e6c0
commit
c4e7c858da
@ -155,6 +155,12 @@ Looking at this with regard to current fees illustrates the problem pretty clear
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
You can see that it is *much cheaper* to use L-BTC. In fact its so cheap that its fine to open 25,000 sat channels...thus keeping our hot-wallet exposure risk quite low. (The above was calculated using boltz.exchange)
|
You can see that it is *much cheaper* to use L-BTC. In fact its so cheap that its fine to open 25,000 sat channels...thus keeping our hot-wallet exposure risk quite low. (The above was calculated using boltz.exchange)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The ability to open **small + cheap channels** really changes the game. You can choose to keep your funds safely in Liquid UTXOs and then deploy into LN as needed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Something like this:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|

|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Pegging Out
|
## Pegging Out
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
There are a few different solutions for peg-out, but sadly all require a 3rd party.
|
There are a few different solutions for peg-out, but sadly all require a 3rd party.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user