b0xxer/web
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
b0xxer 2024-02-04 10:31:03 -06:00
parent 7d7c5ba7f9
commit e3e54b010a
1 changed files with 4 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md
View File

@ -132,26 +132,15 @@ What if you have no desire to create tokens, securities, etc...can you still mak
Yes, probably one of the best ways to do that is to use it as a *staging area* for opening Lightning channels. In fact, both Blockstream Green and the newly announced (more user friendly) AQUA both do that under-the-hood[^5].
A brief overview of pain points in setting up LN channels.
Ignore inbound liquidity issues, lets just look at current pain points in setting up outbound LN channels:
* High fees to open / close
* High fees then force larger minimums for open / close
* Higher channel sizes then increases risk
* Ultimately must fund following to get outbound-inbound channel setup:
- Fee for channel open
- Buy in-bound liquidity
- Fee for in-bound liquidity open
- Fee(s) for channel close
* Channel partners impose large for inbound minimums (ie LNBig 200,000 sats minimum)
If we ignore inbound liquidity issues for the moment, currently opening an outbound LN channel would require approx 7500 sats to complete (right now fee rate is quite low at 30vb/sat, this figure could easily double or triple!). This implies a cost basis of 7.5% to open a 100,000 sat channel.
Currently opening an outbound LN channel would require approx 7500 sats to complete[^6], this implies a cost basis of 7.5% to open a 100,000 sat channel. Therefore as mentioned above, we are incentivized to open larger channels to minimize the fee cost. As fees go higher, this pushes minimum channel sizes ever higher. Ultimately this leads us taking on more risk than we would like to.
Therefore as mentioned above, we are incentivized to open larger channels to minimize the fee cost. As fees go higher, this pushes minimum channel sizes ever higher. Ultimately this leads us taking on more risk than we would like to.
However if we use Liquid as the *staging area* the cost plummets. Currently opening a 15,000 sat LN channel from Liquid would currently cost approx 163 sats in fee -- thats only a 1% cost basis (over 7x cheaper than doing it on mainchain *and a much smaller channel*). Cost basis goes even lower if we go for larger channels, so a 100,000 sat LN open from Liquid would cost 248 sats -- a 0.25% cost basis!
There is a way to use Liquid to mitigate these problems. Essentially you can use Liquid as an *intermediate staging* area for your BTC. Then from L-BTC you can open LN channels much cheaper. In fact, its so much cheaper to open LN channels from Liquid that you can open *much smaller* channels *much more frequently*...thus minimizing hot-wallet risk.
As an example, opening a 15,000 sat LN channel from Liquid would currently cost approx 163 sats in fee -- thats only a 1% cost basis (over 7x cheaper than doing it on mainchain *and a much smaller channel*). If we equalized this to our above BTC mainchain example: A 100,000 sat LN open from Liquid would cost 248 sats -- a 0.25% cost basis!
Let's take a concrete example. Assume that someone has 100,000,000 sats on-chain as their main savings. They could move 500,000 sats to L-BTC (paying approx 7500 sat in fees to do so), and wind up with ~490,000 sats in L-BTC. From there, they could every few weeks open a 50,000 sat LN channel and pay only 198 sats in fees for each open.
@ -188,3 +177,4 @@ Let's take a concrete example. Assume that someone has 100,000,000 sats on-chain
[^3]: Please `git clone` the repo and don't rely on the pre-compiled downloads in repo (they are out of date from source)
[^4]: You can specify to individual wallets in the swap-tool URL connect string by using the `http://user:password@localhost:7041/wallet/walletname` syntax
[^5]: They are using services like Boltz, which allows you to open Lightning Channels with L-BTC. NOTE: [BTCSessions did a great video/review](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kNMJd-Ts2c) of how to use Liquid as a way to very cheaply onboard from fiat as cheap as possible. Summary is Fiat -> CEX -> BTC -> Liquid -> Boltz -> LN. Obviously if your CEX has a LN withdrawal option you don't need all these steps!)
[^6]: Right now fee rate is quite low at 30vb/sat, this figure could easily double or triple!