b0xxer/web
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
b0xxer 2024-02-05 05:15:00 -06:00
parent 5b514d9a3a
commit ab47cb8f1f
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
docs/liquid/liquid-part3.md
View File

@ -147,14 +147,14 @@ Looking at this with regard to current fees illustrates the problem pretty clear
| | 100,000 sat | ~ 12,500 sat | 12.5% |
| | 200,000 sat | ~ 12,500 sat | 6.25% |
| | 500,000 sat | ~ 12,500 sat | 2.5% |
| L-BTC| 10,000 sat | 158 sat | 1.5% |
| L-BTC| 10,000 sat | ~ 158 sat | 1.5% |
| | 20,000 sat | ~ 168 sat | 0.8% |
| | 50,000 sat | ~ 198 sat | 0.4% |
| | 100,000 sat | ~ 248 sat | 0.2% |
| | 200,000 sat | ~ 348 sat | 0.1% |
| | 500,000 sat | ~ 648 sat | 0.1% |
You can see that it is *much cheaper* to use L-BTC. In fact its so cheap that its fine to open 25,000 sat channels...thus keeping our hot-wallet exposure risk quite low.
You can see that it is *much cheaper* to use L-BTC. In fact its so cheap that its fine to open 25,000 sat channels...thus keeping our hot-wallet exposure risk quite low. (The above was calculated using boltz.exchange )
### Comparing eCash / Lightning / Liquid / BTC